Tags: How To Write Methodology In Research ProposalEssay A Apply Texas5 Paragraph Expository Essay OutlineResearch Papers On Male Domestic ViolenceChinese Use Of Essay Exams For Civil Service SelectionHow To Problem Solve EffectivelyLocke EssayCollege Essays John HopkinsEssay On Nativism In The Us
Ultimately, Rose has clearly explained that personal experience is an important aspect that influences the human decision-making processes.- In viewing 12 Angry Men, we see face to face exactly what man really is capable of being.This is why juror 10 cannot see the truth, as prejudiced takes over his thinking abilities and does not let him comprehend the facts of the case.
The play ‘Twelve Angry Men’ by Reginald Rose contains many elements that examine the implementation of the American justice system in 1957 and help shape the deliberations of the case.
Perhaps the most important element is the relationship between...
Twelve Angry Men is an allegorical play written by Reginald Rose in 1955. Enterprise was on deep alert after discovering a sleeper cell in space with seventy-two unconscious super-humans inside (Coon, 1967). by Reginald Rose is a drama based on the true systems and ideals put in place within the American Justice system.
It depicts the way in which economic, social and cultural factors can have a significant impact on the process of justice. "Insufficient facts always invite danger" declared Spock to Captain Kirk as the U. The 12 characters are all symbolic of the different aspects of western society. An enemy of the people vs 12 angry men When an individual desires something so strongly, this individual will vigorously invest him/herself into achieving this desire that they begin to lose their moral compass.
This is evident in the play when the 3rd Juror’s personal experience with his own son influences his decision and as a result he votes for guilty, the 9th Jurors old age becomes one of the greatest factors which influences his judgement of the boy ; when the 5th Jurors personal experience in a slum causes further doubts to form in his mind It is clear throughout the play that personal His observation of the old man witness demonstrates his own experience as an old man who has never been recognised until he was called to participate in a jury.
This is affirmed when he says: “I think I know him better than anyone here.Perhaps with the knowledge he has accumulated by living in a slum gives him an upper hand over the rest of the jurors’ as he can relate to it.Accordingly the 5th jurors background aids him in making a wise decision.It is for this reason that he was able to explain the way to hold the switchblade knife.He says: “you don’t use this kind of knife that way.” (Act 2 page 49).For instance, juror 3’s bad relationship with his son in the past and juror7’s ignorant attitude towards the case ultimately affect their perspective about the facts and evidence presented in the case.As a result, these factors not only obscure the truth but also make it hard for the jury to reach a just verdict and In the early part of the play, juror 10 claims: “You can’t believe a word they say. This emphasize the problem of his prejudice is that he views the defendant not as an individual but as a representative of a group which means his perspective towards the defendant is different compared with other jurors.This is seen through juror 3 who has a young son about the age of the defendant.From the play, it is obvious that the relationship between him and his son is a violent one with him vowing to “make a man outta you or…Moreover, the 5th juror’s experience in a slum makes him doubtful of the guiltiness of the boy.His upbringing in a slum assisted him in reasoning with the other jurors’ of the innocence of the defendant.