I also didn’t expect the feminism, and the extension of the analysis from the Well, this was not quite what I expected.The topic broadens into the public policy consequences of his theory and the metaphysical purposes of misery.He did not fo I’m not sure what exactly I expected from this little book.
I also didn’t expect the feminism, and the extension of the analysis from the Well, this was not quite what I expected.The topic broadens into the public policy consequences of his theory and the metaphysical purposes of misery.He did not fo I’m not sure what exactly I expected from this little book.Tags: Introduction Transition Words For EssaysStarting Event Planning BusinessWriting An Outline For An Analytical EssayEssays By Albert EinsteinEssay On Science And Technology In FutureBu Creative Writing FacultyThesis On River Water PollutionBusiness Transition Plan TemplatePoetry Essay Example
The tension he identifies between food supplies and population increase lead him to conclude that some poverty and suffering is inevitable, and that a perfect utopia is an idle dream.
But don’t mistake this realistic view of things for gloating about the destitution of the masses.
About the Series: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the broadest spectrum of literature from around the globe.
Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, voluminous notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.
In point of fact, the central concern of this book is to improve the lot of the greatest possible number of people.
True, for reasons he lays forth, Malthus is not very optimistic about this prospect.He did not foresee the widespread use of contraceptives, nor the dazzling improvements in farming technology that would appear in the years to come. But then why has Malthus been brought up in every class on the environment that I have ever taken?I wonder what Malthus would say if you told him that, in the future, less than 2% of the population of the United States would be farmers, and that the population of the world would exceed 7 billion. This must be because, although Malthus was gloriously (and thankfully) wrong in the specifics, the general problem that he elucidates here is an important one that somehow eluded the attention of every major thinker before him.As the human species continues to multiply at an ever-increasing rate, the ghost of Malthus will continue to haunt us.I have heard it said that Malthus was an enemy of the poor—a lassez-faire capitalist that didn’t want welfare states to impinge on the free market.People have known that since the dawn of Humans tend to increase faster than they can create food, so at a certain point they will be unable to support themselves.That general idea is so obvious that it seems hard to believe someone would have to come up with it, and Malthus is just the guy who laid it out most clearly. But he's also been consistently misinterpreted and vilified since day one by people who, for example, think he's advocating policies to kill off poor people.I also didn’t expect the feminism, and the extension of the analysis from the of the misery produced by the imbalance in population and agriculture.As a clergyman, Malthus understandably felt it incumbent on him to justify to man the ways of a God who would create such a law of nature.If the world is to be improved, it does no good to play around with utopian dreams where the streets are paved with gold and everyone eats candy without gaining weight or getting cavities.The solution will require a hard-headed, realistic analysis of the problem, our identifying what we can reasonably expect to work based on what has worked in the past, and our working with what is currently possible given the political situation.