Tags: Argumentative Essay On Stem Cell ResearchGuide To Business PlanningA Research ThesisA Level Creative Writing CourseworkBusiness Plan For Massage TherapistAssignment Availability Code 31A Modern Day Fairy Tale EssayDescriptive Essay HelpManagement DissertationData Structures And Problem Solving Using Java 4th Edition
As a reviewer, one of the first things you want to be sure to notice in the paper is if you can figure out who the paper is addressing.
This not only allows you to receive feedback on your paper, but it also develops your skills in providing feedback and looking for specific elements in a paper. Whether you're passing your paper off or reviewing a paper, your skills in writing can be greatly enhanced.
In the peer review process, it's helpful to have a plan of action in addressing the paper.
You've put in the work of researching, reading, writing and revising your paper.
You've read it out loud and followed the assignment requirements.
While your paper won't require that same heightened, professional level of critique, bringing it to one of your peers—whether a classmate, a friend, a mentor—can enhance your research paper greatly.
Here, we share about the importance of incorporating a peer review process for both the author and the reviewer.
A peer review of your research paper is different than the editing process that you go through.
Rather than you going through each section, citation, argument in your paper, someone else does.
But the peer edit can be so beneficial in enhancing your writing.
We may often think of "peer review" in terms of journal articles that have been analyzed and approved for accuracy.