Essays About Hipaa

Tags: Theory Of Computation Solved ProblemsSimple Steps Of Writing An EssayPersuasive Essay Writing Graphic OrganizersCause And Effect Essay Assignment SheetNight Quotes EssayBattleship Potemkin Odessa Steps EssayLive Person HomeworkProblem Solving Solutions

This is because it failed to store patients’ and research subjects’ information in an encrypted version.

The fact that the laptop contained patients’ and research subjects’ information that had not been discretely coded in a manner that could not be understood by unauthorized persons justifies this.

In other words, MEEI failed to comply with the privacy standards hence, put e PHI at stake (Healthcare Provider to Pay $1.5M HIPAA Fine, 2012).

This kind of incidence may gravely impact on MEEI because the patients and research subjects may sue the institution if the information gets to them.

According to the HIPAA security law, the administration is meant to conduct risk analysis in the security management process. The security management process entails various steps and one step may affect subsequent steps.

Risk analysis is related to disaster preparedness and mitigation hence the need to evaluate the possibility of putting e PHI at risk (U. Due to the failure of performing a thorough risk analysis, MEEI was not able to implement effective security measures aimed at protecting its e PHI contained in portable devices.Therefore, violation of the HIPAA privacy and security rule as indicated by the Department of Health and Human Services OCR was resolved through payment of

Risk analysis is related to disaster preparedness and mitigation hence the need to evaluate the possibility of putting e PHI at risk (U. Due to the failure of performing a thorough risk analysis, MEEI was not able to implement effective security measures aimed at protecting its e PHI contained in portable devices.

Therefore, violation of the HIPAA privacy and security rule as indicated by the Department of Health and Human Services OCR was resolved through payment of $1.5M by MEEI.

In addition, the organization made a commitment to improve its policies and procedures to ensure that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is achieved and well maintained.

The solution of paying a fine of $1.5M came about after the office for Civil Rights (OCR) under the department of health and human services gave its stand on the whole issue after evaluating the report submitted by MEEEI about the theft.

According to the OCR, MEEI did not comply with the ethical principle that advocates for protection of individuals’ privacy and respect for individuals’ dignity.

||

Risk analysis is related to disaster preparedness and mitigation hence the need to evaluate the possibility of putting e PHI at risk (U. Due to the failure of performing a thorough risk analysis, MEEI was not able to implement effective security measures aimed at protecting its e PHI contained in portable devices.Therefore, violation of the HIPAA privacy and security rule as indicated by the Department of Health and Human Services OCR was resolved through payment of $1.5M by MEEI.In addition, the organization made a commitment to improve its policies and procedures to ensure that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is achieved and well maintained.The solution of paying a fine of $1.5M came about after the office for Civil Rights (OCR) under the department of health and human services gave its stand on the whole issue after evaluating the report submitted by MEEEI about the theft.According to the OCR, MEEI did not comply with the ethical principle that advocates for protection of individuals’ privacy and respect for individuals’ dignity.The third management responsibility that was overlooked is developing or delegating someone to develop and implement policies and procedures that restrict access to e PHI.These are meant to ensure that accessibility to e PHI is only permissible to authorized health personnel.Therefore, anyone accessing the stolen laptop was able to view this information thus publicly exposing the clinical details of the concerned individuals.According to the ethical principle on privacy, individual identifiable health information should be protected from unauthorized persons.The management team at MEEI should have complied with the HIPAA privacy and security rule with regard to certain elements that need to be kept in check.One responsibility is that the management ought to have made a thorough risk analysis of the confidentiality of the information contained in the laptop (a portable device).

.5M by MEEI.In addition, the organization made a commitment to improve its policies and procedures to ensure that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is achieved and well maintained.The solution of paying a fine of

Risk analysis is related to disaster preparedness and mitigation hence the need to evaluate the possibility of putting e PHI at risk (U. Due to the failure of performing a thorough risk analysis, MEEI was not able to implement effective security measures aimed at protecting its e PHI contained in portable devices.

Therefore, violation of the HIPAA privacy and security rule as indicated by the Department of Health and Human Services OCR was resolved through payment of $1.5M by MEEI.

In addition, the organization made a commitment to improve its policies and procedures to ensure that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is achieved and well maintained.

The solution of paying a fine of $1.5M came about after the office for Civil Rights (OCR) under the department of health and human services gave its stand on the whole issue after evaluating the report submitted by MEEEI about the theft.

According to the OCR, MEEI did not comply with the ethical principle that advocates for protection of individuals’ privacy and respect for individuals’ dignity.

||

Risk analysis is related to disaster preparedness and mitigation hence the need to evaluate the possibility of putting e PHI at risk (U. Due to the failure of performing a thorough risk analysis, MEEI was not able to implement effective security measures aimed at protecting its e PHI contained in portable devices.Therefore, violation of the HIPAA privacy and security rule as indicated by the Department of Health and Human Services OCR was resolved through payment of $1.5M by MEEI.In addition, the organization made a commitment to improve its policies and procedures to ensure that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is achieved and well maintained.The solution of paying a fine of $1.5M came about after the office for Civil Rights (OCR) under the department of health and human services gave its stand on the whole issue after evaluating the report submitted by MEEEI about the theft.According to the OCR, MEEI did not comply with the ethical principle that advocates for protection of individuals’ privacy and respect for individuals’ dignity.The third management responsibility that was overlooked is developing or delegating someone to develop and implement policies and procedures that restrict access to e PHI.These are meant to ensure that accessibility to e PHI is only permissible to authorized health personnel.Therefore, anyone accessing the stolen laptop was able to view this information thus publicly exposing the clinical details of the concerned individuals.According to the ethical principle on privacy, individual identifiable health information should be protected from unauthorized persons.The management team at MEEI should have complied with the HIPAA privacy and security rule with regard to certain elements that need to be kept in check.One responsibility is that the management ought to have made a thorough risk analysis of the confidentiality of the information contained in the laptop (a portable device).

.5M came about after the office for Civil Rights (OCR) under the department of health and human services gave its stand on the whole issue after evaluating the report submitted by MEEEI about the theft.According to the OCR, MEEI did not comply with the ethical principle that advocates for protection of individuals’ privacy and respect for individuals’ dignity.The third management responsibility that was overlooked is developing or delegating someone to develop and implement policies and procedures that restrict access to e PHI.These are meant to ensure that accessibility to e PHI is only permissible to authorized health personnel.Therefore, anyone accessing the stolen laptop was able to view this information thus publicly exposing the clinical details of the concerned individuals.According to the ethical principle on privacy, individual identifiable health information should be protected from unauthorized persons.The management team at MEEI should have complied with the HIPAA privacy and security rule with regard to certain elements that need to be kept in check.One responsibility is that the management ought to have made a thorough risk analysis of the confidentiality of the information contained in the laptop (a portable device).

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Essays About Hipaa

The Latest from blizko-region.ru ©