It takes hours and hours to sift through thousands and thousands of pages to find these numbers, suggesting the UN is interested in burying them.
It takes hours and hours to sift through thousands and thousands of pages to find these numbers, suggesting the UN is interested in burying them.Tags: Columbia Graduate School Creative WritingCase Study Zara Fashion Supply ChainHonesty Is The Best Policy EssaysSaving Private Ryan Essay Year 10Compare Contrast Essay TypesAssignment Problem In Operational Research PptHomework Diary CompanyEssay On Why I Want To Be A Sheriff
In spite of these definitional and time-line differences, the CEB reports confirm our previous findings - women hold about 22 percent of senior leadership positions in the Secretariat, and there is a recent trend of even further privileging men over women in the U. But we must recognize that the United Nations making some progress. Ban prepares to step down at the end of 2016, the election process for his successor, which has traditionally been cloaked in mystery, is becoming more transparent.
For the first time, member states will not only nominate but also interview official candidates.
If it is hard for an international organization overtly dedicated to achieving it, how can we expect national governments and corporations to live up to it? Security Council considers situation in Somalia, Feb 2016. And so, while there are now 37 women in 166 senior posts (compared to 20 out of 110 in 2006), the overall expansion of the UN’s senior leadership - and consistent hiring of men over women - has diluted the impact of new female appointments.
Take the United States: according to a Mc Kinsey/Lean-In study, women in corporate America “are underrepresented at every level in the corporate pipeline.” In the Senate, of the 31 women who have ever been elected, 20 are serving now (compared to 80 current male counterparts). While the of women leaders has not increased so dramatically.
Security Council debates post-conflict peacebuilding, Feb 2016.
©UN The Secretary General’s report on the reports included all staff, regardless of their contract type, term, or source of funding.Table 1 shows the percentage of women holding USG/ASG level posts by year, broken down by each Secretary General’s tenure.The graph on the left shows the percentage of women USG/ASG over time.Of the 112 Supreme Court Justices in history, four have been women, and three of them are currently serving. Additionally, in the UN’s most high-level body, chaired by the Secretary General - the Senior Management Group - only 12 of the team’s 39 members are women. Considering the confusing, even misleading rhetoric of the UN system that papers over the glacially slow progress in women’s share of senior staff positions at the UN Secretariat, it is important to check these findings against another source.A visualization of the comparison of these data with the Chief Executive Board's list of “regular budget staff’ shown in Table 3 below, show how this analysis is in fact correct.The CEB’s reports provide annual statistical tables on UN staff, employed by the regular budget, with appointments for a period of one year or more.In contrast to the reports that cover data from the end of the fiscal year (June 30), CEB reports cover data from the end of the calendar year (December 31).In 2015, the Secretariat's leadership was concentrated in 166 individuals of USG/ASG status.According to UN reports, these senior staff members - heads of important U. departments and offices, directly appointed by the Secretary-General - make up over 50% of the entire UN system’s senior leadership.Indeed, most would consider the overall numbers of the combined USG and ASG population — not the subsets — to be most relevant and reflective of gender representation in senior leadership of the Secretariat, and these percentages are the most disappointing.As of June 30, 2015, just 37 of the 166 total USG/ASG Secretariat population were women, or about 22 percent.